Description
Cervical Assessment of the Laboring patient is a skill that is important for effective labor management, but may have limited opportunities for learning in the actual clinical setting. Thus, some medical students may not achieve competency prior to graduation. Assessing a learner’s ability requires allowing them to perform actual digital exams on patients in the office or on labor and delivery, with an experienced practitioner confirming their exam. It is important to understand the changes that occur in the cervix and vagina during labor leading to delivery.
Skills training in cervical assessment requires prior knowledge of:
- Female vaginal and cervical anatomy
- Definitions of cervical dilation, effacement and fetal station
- Technique for intrapartum cervical assessment
- Indications, contraindications, benefits and risks of cervical assessments
NOTE: This entire module is also available in PDF Format.
Learning Outcomes
This clinical skills module provides a standardized framework for teaching learners how to assess the cervix in labor utilizing standardized cervical models. Following participation in this module, students should demonstrate the following learning outcomes:
- Define cervical dilation
- Define cervical effacement
- Define how to assess fetal station
- Understand how to identify the presenting part
- Understand the normal female vaginal and pelvic anatomy
- Review the indications, benefits, and risk of cervical assessments
- Demonstrate accurate assessment of cervical dilation and effacement on standardized models
Best Practices
Reliance upon clinical expertise as a gold standard for determining accuracy of cervical assessment skill is under investigation. Experienced clinicians accurately assessed dilation only about 50% of the time. Accuracy appears to decrease with advancing cervical dilation and may vary with the type of simulator model, with soft models providing a more realistic, but less accurate, examination simulation than hard models. Thus, learners may benefit from learning on firm models first.
We suggest that cervical model simulators be used to teach the initial clinical intrapartum vaginal exam. Below is a photograph of low resource clay models.

Checklist
The following checklist may be used as a component of the training session and/or as a component of a performance assessment as part of an objective structured clinical examination.
|
Done |
Not
Done |
Describe the benefits, risks, and indications for cervical assessment |
|
|
Describe the technique of properly assessing dilation, effacement, and station. |
|
|
Explain procedure to patient |
|
|
Put on gloves in a sterile fashion |
|
|
Use lubricant on two fingers that will be used to perform vaginal examination |
|
|
Use non-dominant hand to separate labia |
|
|
Use two fingers of the dominant hand to assess the cervix |
|
|
Assess presenting part |
|
|
Accurately assesses cervical dilation |
|
|
Accurately assesses cervical effacement |
|
|
Demonstrates appropriate sterile technique throughout examination |
|
|
Practical Tips
Following completion of appropriate didactic or self-directed background learning, students should participate in a mentored hands-on practice session/lab. The practice session should include a demonstration of the following skills:
- Measure finger width and length using the standardized scale
- Perform practice assessments on unblinded and blinded cervical models
Resources
Models may be hand-made or purchased from commercial vendors. Some of the available models are listed below.
Model Name |
Manufacturer |
Approximate cost |
Hand made sculpting clay |
Any modeling clay and softballs |
<$50 |
Cervical effacement and dilatation model |
Health Edco |
$120-566 |
Labor Stages model |
3B Scientific |
$500 |
Cervical dilatation/Effacement Simulator |
Life/Form |
$895 |
Cervical Examination and Childbirth Simulator |
Nucleus |
$750-1000 |
_______________
- Tuffnell DJ, Bryce F, Johnson N, Lilford RJ. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment. Lancet. 1989 Nov 4;2(8671):1089-90.
- Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;173(3 Pt 1):942-5.
- Phelps JY, Lambrou N, Roshanfekr D. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation and effacement measurements. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 1;5(4):185.
- Huhn KA, Brost BC. Accuracy of simulated cervical dilation and effacement measurements among practitioners. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1797-9.