Peer Observation And Feedback Interventions To Improve Teaching Skills Among Medical Educators: A Systematic Review
Objective:This review aimed to
understand current evidence on best practices in peer-to-peer interventions to
improve teaching skills among physician educators.(25 words)
Data Sources:PubMed, ERIC, MedEdPORTAL,
Embase, Scopus (5 words)
Methods of Study Selection:
Systematic review methodology was used, with two authors performing each stage
of the review.The search was conducted
on all articles within the above databases from 1/1/2000 to 8/31/2022.Reference lists of included articles will
also be reviewed.The search will be
re-run prior to final analysis.Inclusion criteria are: English, primary studies, undergraduate or
graduate medical education, participants are faculty, intervention is
peer-to-peer, in-person teaching, measurable outcomes, intervention includes
all three elements (goal-setting, direct observation, feedback).(81 words)
Tabulation, Integration and Results:(as
of 12/21/22)
The initial search found 5044 studies, 1788 duplicates were removed, and 3256
studies were each reviewed by two authors for title/abstract screening. Conflicts
were resolved by SC, 116 studies are included in full text review, where each
study will be reviewed by RF and one other author.Data extraction will be completed by 2
authors, with conflicts resolved by consensus.(61 words)
Conclusion:The primary author
underestimated the length of time it would take to complete a systematic
review.Full text review will be
complete by 1/1/22, data extraction in the following month. (32 words)
