Home > Abstract Details > Perceptions Regarding Medical Students Performing Pelvic Examinations on Anesthetized Female Patients

« Back to Search

Perceptions Regarding Medical Students Performing Pelvic Examinations on Anesthetized Female Patients

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine perceptions regarding medical students performingpelvic examinations on anesthetized female patients.

Background: Pelvic exams performed under anesthesia continues to be a controversial topic, but studies looking at medical staff are lacking.

Methods: An internet based survey was distributed to OB/GYNs, OR nurses/techs,anesthesiologists/CRNAs, and medical students at multiple hospitals and medical schools.Demographic data were collected. Non-demographic answers to questions were recorded on a 5-point scale. Characteristics between the respondent groups were statistically compared usingChi-squared test for independence and the Fisher’s Exact Test.

Results: 337surverys were completed. 72% of respondents believed permission should be obtained from patientsprior to the performance of EUAs by medical students on anesthetized femalepatients. 30% of respondents believed prior consent was usually obtained. 50% believed patients would agree to have the exams performed. 80% thought patients would be upset if an EUA by a medical student was performed on them  without their prior consent. 32% of nurses believed medical students should be allowed to examine anesthetized patients.  Medical students were less likely to believe it was appropriate for a student to examine a patient, there was an educational benefit, and that patients would consent. 

Discussions: Despite the perception of all OB/GYN OR team members that consent should be obtained beforemedical students perform pelvic examinations on anesthetized female patients, this does notusually occur. Almost 50% of medical students would not encourage their female relatives toconsent to medical students performing such pelvic examinations.

Topics: CREOG & APGO Annual Meeting, 2019, Student, Resident, Faculty, Clerkship Director, Clerkship Coordinator, Osteopathic Faculty, Residency Director, Patient Care, Professionalism, GME, Quality & Safety, Advocacy,

General Information


Intended
Audience
Student,Resident,Faculty,Clerkship Director,Clerkship Coordinator,Osteopathic Faculty,Residency Director,
Competencies
Addressed
Patient Care,Professionalism,
Educational
Continuum
GME,
Educational
Focus
Quality & Safety,Advocacy,
Clinical Focus

Author Information

Elizabeth Rice, DO, Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia; White Chase, MD; John Myers, DO; Janet Ko, MD; Jay Goldberg, MD; David Jaspan, DO

Additional Materials


Related Abstracts


Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics

2130 Priest Bridge Drive, Suite 7, Crofton, MD 21114

410-451-9560

APGO logo

Follow Us


COPYRIGHT © 2020
Association of Professors of
Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO)